The Spok is dead...

I think the questions in bold could be a problem. I can't see them releasing the third one for data protection reasons. Two years is a long time and I would imagine far pre-dates that hole, six months would probably have been better, but good luck with it. They're good questions anyway.

- Dates of all safety inspections undertaken on the carriageway in the two years preceding today's date.
- Details of all carriageway defects identified during safety inspections in the two years preceding today's date.

• Details of how carriageway safety inspections are undertaken, including whether walked or driven, the speed of the inspection vehicle and the number of persons in the vehicle.
  
• The intended frequency of carriageway safety inspections.
  - Details of all complaints and/or enquiries relating to the carriageway, received in the two years preceding today's date.
  
• The hierarchy classification.
  
• The road/section number.
  
• The defect intervention criteria adopted in relation to the identification of all categories of carriageway potholes (in other words, how a pothole is defined as requiring attention).
  
• The time period(s) adopted between identification and repair (temporary and permanent) of all categories of carriageway defects.
  
• Whether or not TfL has formally adopted all or part of the standards contained within the national code of practice for highways maintenance management.
  
  

I understand that this information should be provided within a maximum of 20 days, however, I would appreciate a speedier response.[/I]