You are reading a single comment by @deleted and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Proven how, exactly?

    You're a journalist aren't you? Do some research; it's laughable that any one would give their opinion of Lance Armstrong's probity without, apparently, knowing that he tested positive for EPO (retrospective but no serious challenge to the validity of the tests was ever mounted; not did he sue as he did every time it was his word against someone else's).
    Try reading anything by David Walsh, or find out what Paul Kimmage thinks of the great hero. Or you can google Greg Lemond. Discover how he lied about his supposed weight loss; often give as the reason he was suddenly able to be the best climber in the world. There is a stack of conclusive evidence against Armstrong; and that is leaving aside the *fact *that ***he tested positive for EPO. ***
    That the team he rode for this year has been discovered to have been in possession of blood transfusion equipment may not be proof that he is still up to his old tricks; but there were reportedly seven different DNA profiles taken from that equipment. Somehow seven of his team mates were cheating while he fought the good fight.

About

Avatar for deleted @deleted started