I could accept that there was no climate change but surely the vast losses of the planet's lungs (the amazon) must have a huge effect, no?
Or am I being a simpleton?
Climate change denyers most common argument is that we are witnessing a natural cycle. I guess our ancestors also must have engaged in unprecendented amounts of land clearance and logging. Odd then that they have few qualms that the obvious end result of such actions is that we got kicked back to the pre-stoneage with absolutely no preservation of cultural history. It kind of clashes with their mantra that we should all carry on as before and all will be well but I'm sure they can hackney some justification for this disparity in their position.
Climate change denyers most common argument is that we are witnessing a natural cycle. I guess our ancestors also must have engaged in unprecendented amounts of land clearance and logging. Odd then that they have few qualms that the obvious end result of such actions is that we got kicked back to the pre-stoneage with absolutely no preservation of cultural history. It kind of clashes with their mantra that we should all carry on as before and all will be well but I'm sure they can hackney some justification for this disparity in their position.