• And what I'm trying to say is that your list is based entirely on mechanical reasoning and not taking into account application or human interaction therefore it is pointless.

    I submit references to other types of transport for your approval.

    SR71 Blackbird. Mach 3.2. It flew high enough to see the curvature of the Earth, and the pilots had to wear space suits. The aircraft leaked on the ground because the panel gaps had to allow for expansion during the intense heat build up while flying at over 3 times the speed of sound. Is it better than a Boeing 747? In terms of engineering and mechanical hardship in designing and manufacturing, yes! Would I want to fly in one to go on holiday? No.

    Radical SR8. Quickest production car around the Nurburgring. Immensely lightweight despite V8 engine. Ridiculous levels of mechanical grip and downforce. Is it a mechanical marvel? Is it a feat of engineering? Yes! Would I drive one to the shops? No.

    10 years ago, someone once rocked up at Rom skatepark with a rear disc brake on his BMX. As a 14 year old boy I was amazed, thinking why don't more people use disc brakes on a BMX rather than these shitty U Brakes. 10 minutes later it was lying in pieces on the ground. Both he and I found out rather quickly why people don't use disc brakes on a BMX.

About