I tend not to see it like that. Should have been longer IMO. Ok we can say that he drove into/over him by accident and maybe he didnt see the cyclist or what ever but then comes the aftermath, he drove for however many miles, pulled over, and got rid of the bike. This shows some serious intent for which he should have been properly puinished. Its like disposing of a murder weapon or hiding the loot from an armed robbery. Oh but its ok, its just the cyclist belongings bla bla bla.
But yes 2 years tax free sounds like a good deal for getting James martin (the chef?) off our sxcreens :D
I didn't see evidence he threw away the bike, but the fact he failed to even acknowledge the noise and disturbance is a massive neglect of his duty as a road user. Pure ignorance!
If he did do it deliberately and knowingly then he should be shot! but I would hate to think someone would do that.. I’d prefer to believe he panicked. It’s really hard to put yourself in that situation.. what would you do???
I didn't see evidence he threw away the bike, but the fact he failed to even acknowledge the noise and disturbance is a massive neglect of his duty as a road user. Pure ignorance!
If he did do it deliberately and knowingly then he should be shot! but I would hate to think someone would do that.. I’d prefer to believe he panicked. It’s really hard to put yourself in that situation.. what would you do???