Another 'controversial' debate because a minority activity is 'threatening' established interests by becoming more normal. Yes, let's just do some pointless emotionalising of the issues and carve people up into two sides of a 'debate'.
Yaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
i agree.
their chosen topic is worded in such a totalising way too - 'are cyclists a menace' - one giant collective menace?
they should have been clever and wordy where they were pedestrian and rhetorical
i agree.
their chosen topic is worded in such a totalising way too - 'are cyclists a menace' - one giant collective menace?
they should have been clever and wordy where they were pedestrian and rhetorical