well, she fell down because the lorry hit her, most probably.
We as cyclists at least know that's the most probable reason. But seeing as the eye witness wouldn't commit to saying he actually saw that happen (instead of saying "a coming together" firstly and then later not being sure of any contact WTF??) the verdict can only be accidental.
That raises an interesting question: if there had been no eyewitnesses at all, would the coroner have brought in the underlying statistics to conclude that the lorry was at fault?
That raises an interesting question: if there had been no eyewitnesses at all, would the coroner have brought in the underlying statistics to conclude that the lorry was at fault?