You'd need to know what the 'thing' is that you are claiming does not exist.
You might as well say "+7^56%64 does not exist" - and when asked what '+7^56%64' is - answer (if honest) "I have no clue what you (and I) are talking about".
God doesn't exist is literally similar (epistemologically rather than culturally) the same (not similar, but actually the same) as saying "colorless green ideas sleep furiously".
Ie: it's a nonsense statement, a category mistake, as much as it follows very basic rules of syntax.
This is all nonsense. The thing we are talking about is an omnipotent power. My comments were purposefully flippant. But you are making a merely semantic point about a serious substantive claim. A preponderance of scientific and logical evidence exists to cast doubt on an omnipotent being, and your semantics do nothing to counter that weight.
This is all nonsense. The thing we are talking about is an omnipotent power. My comments were purposefully flippant. But you are making a merely semantic point about a serious substantive claim. A preponderance of scientific and logical evidence exists to cast doubt on an omnipotent being, and your semantics do nothing to counter that weight.