Dr Chan is LOL cat (repost)

1) The mechanism of natural selection is random, therefore, humans are the outcome of a random process (i.e., there is no purpose inscribed into life)

Natural selection is anything but random !

Speciation through natural selection is incredible, literally incredible, vastly complex, stunningly consistent, it makes ridiculously towering predictions (based on the system), enormously arrogant predictions, predictions no other theory could dare make - not even something so 'self-evident' as the theory of gravitation - and each and every time, always, and with breathless accuracy - is show to be absolutely right.

It is many things, but it is certainly not 'random' - the whole foundation of a theory or hypothesis is to suggest that there is a 'system' (pattern) to what is being hypothesised, If it were random, there would be no theory, axiomatically.

I understand the difference between the actual process and the theory, (you are commenting on the process) but the theory is based on a sound footing by the facts of the process, none of which are random.

2) War_rape describes Rape committed by Soldier , other Combatant or Civilian during armed conflict or War . During war and armed conflict rape is frequently used as means of Psychological_warfare in order to humiliate the enemy and undermine their morale.

An October 2007 New_York_Times article[105] reported on the large numbers of rapes occurring in the Eastern Congo near Rwanda . It reported (emphasis added):
Eastern Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo is going through another one of its convulsions of violence, and this time it seems that women are being systematically attacked on a scale never before seen here. According to the United Nations, 27,000 sexual assaults were reported in 2006 in South_Kivu alone, and that may be just a fraction of the total number across the country.

Numbers and rape figures with a little teleology doesn't make an argument, the theologists are a few steps ahead of you here, and the Calvinists have passed the finishing line before you have heard the starting gun if this is your reasoning !

can you prove it?

Currently, Mr Gabes is in the correct position, questions only.