Thanks! But my LBS guy is happy to do the technical stuff. I just had a chat with him and we discussed 107 over 110 BB spindles. He was worried about chain stay clearance which is a good point, esp as the steamroller's claim to FFF. The chain stays are likely to bounce out pretty early. But I argued that you, as an owner of both the same frame and crankset used 107.
The other thing he did point out is that as I'm using a freewheel, this is going to be considerable wider than a thin fixed cog, and that could throw the hub/chainline out by a good 2 to 3 mm? Where does that leave me I wonder. Maybe I should have the 110 spindle after all.
My head hurts...
Decided to add to my user dictionary "crankset' and "chain line" 'cause I'm sick of clicking on 'ignore spelling'!
Thanks! But my LBS guy is happy to do the technical stuff. I just had a chat with him and we discussed 107 over 110 BB spindles. He was worried about chain stay clearance which is a good point, esp as the steamroller's claim to FFF. The chain stays are likely to bounce out pretty early. But I argued that you, as an owner of both the same frame and crankset used 107.
The other thing he did point out is that as I'm using a freewheel, this is going to be considerable wider than a thin fixed cog, and that could throw the hub/chainline out by a good 2 to 3 mm? Where does that leave me I wonder. Maybe I should have the 110 spindle after all.
My head hurts...
Decided to add to my user dictionary "crankset' and "chain line" 'cause I'm sick of clicking on 'ignore spelling'!