I take it that your irony indicates I've answered your 'quite genuine' question above?
Let me restate it then- I say that there can be nothing morally objectionable about consuming Clives' lymph when he has willingly donated it.
To take it further if Clive is willing to donate it for your consumption I would say that the onus falls on you to consume it as otherwise it would be destroyed and its nutritional value squandered.
Let me restate it then- I say that there can be nothing morally objectionable about consuming Clives' lymph when he has willingly donated it.
To take it further if Clive is willing to donate it for your consumption I would say that the onus falls on you to consume it as otherwise it would be destroyed and its nutritional value squandered.