Drake v DPP [1994], Lloyd v DPP [1992]. Stickers on windscreens might be considered criminal damage under the 1971 Act. Much safer to use the cattle prod.
Drake v DPP [1994], Lloyd v DPP [1992]. Stickers on windscreens might be considered criminal damage under the 1971 Act.
Much safer to use the cattle prod.
Interesting- in what way would a sticker be judged to be criminal damage?
Forgive me for not being able to leaf through the case history that you reference- otherswise I would UTFS of course.
I would think that criminal damage would have to have a lasting effect upon the item considered to have been damaged- a sticker may be peeled off.
@Dammit started
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
Interesting- in what way would a sticker be judged to be criminal damage?
Forgive me for not being able to leaf through the case history that you reference- otherswise I would UTFS of course.
I would think that criminal damage would have to have a lasting effect upon the item considered to have been damaged- a sticker may be peeled off.