You are reading a single comment by @Dammit and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Drake v DPP [1994], Lloyd v DPP [1992]. Stickers on windscreens might be considered criminal damage under the 1971 Act.

    Much safer to use the cattle prod.

    Interesting- in what way would a sticker be judged to be criminal damage?

    Forgive me for not being able to leaf through the case history that you reference- otherswise I would UTFS of course.

    I would think that criminal damage would have to have a lasting effect upon the item considered to have been damaged- a sticker may be peeled off.

About

Avatar for Dammit @Dammit started