i think it is a good proposal. it is about levels of risk.
if a cyclist crashes (whether breaking the stupic hc or not) into a third party. all invovled will probably live on etc.
if a driver crashes (whether breaking the stupid hc or not) into a third party there could well be death. if the third party is a cyclist or a pedestrian they could well be killed. people who decide to drive should be made to think more about the consequences of their actions and the risks they are exposing themselves to and others to. (as should the oil and motor industry).
i think it is a good proposal. it is about levels of risk.
if a cyclist crashes (whether breaking the stupic hc or not) into a third party. all invovled will probably live on etc.
if a driver crashes (whether breaking the stupid hc or not) into a third party there could well be death. if the third party is a cyclist or a pedestrian they could well be killed. people who decide to drive should be made to think more about the consequences of their actions and the risks they are exposing themselves to and others to. (as should the oil and motor industry).