Whether or not it's polarising, cyclists are dying under the wheels of more powerful vehicles. Not vice versa.
If you are referring to my post, then I was just suggesting that more extreme rules/conditions tend to lead to a wider spectrum of behavior. This could lead to more accidents.
An example of a negative result would be when I nearly gave my 3yo whiplash. I was driving home from a shopping trip when a cyclist on the path crossed a zebra crossing in front of me, without slowing or giving any warning. I'm happy to say that I reacted instantly. The fact is though, had I hit this cyclist, it would have been deemed my fault. This, and the fact that I had to listen to my son sobbing in the back untill I could stop, did not help me feel pity for 'the more vunrable party'.
Absolving people of personal responibility is a dangerous game.
Although I agree totally with this.
Everything else should be secondary to saving lives.
If you are referring to my post, then I was just suggesting that more extreme rules/conditions tend to lead to a wider spectrum of behavior. This could lead to more accidents.
An example of a negative result would be when I nearly gave my 3yo whiplash. I was driving home from a shopping trip when a cyclist on the path crossed a zebra crossing in front of me, without slowing or giving any warning. I'm happy to say that I reacted instantly. The fact is though, had I hit this cyclist, it would have been deemed my fault. This, and the fact that I had to listen to my son sobbing in the back untill I could stop, did not help me feel pity for 'the more vunrable party'.
Absolving people of personal responibility is a dangerous game.
Although I agree totally with this.