Bicycles more dangerous than terrorism?

But the headline and tone of the article does not really represent this. Instead it focuses itself on nonsense comparisons.

I disagree (I think that should be obvious by now) . . . the headline (and subhead) is pretty explicit:

**"7/7 London bombings may have resulted in 'second wave' of casualties on the roads
**The 7/7 London bombings may have resulted in a “second wave” of casualties on the roads as people switched from the tube to travelling by bicycle, psychiatrists believe"

I invite you to point out the 'nonsense comparisons'.