I think how it says "bicycles are more dangerous than terrorism" when they could have said "you are more likely to die of a cycling accident than from a terrorist attack", which is less catchy, of course.
Nowhere in the article does anyone say "bicycles are more dangerous than terrorism".
When I asked for examples of scaremongering I was looking for things from the actual article, rather than paraphrasing or making things up.
Nowhere in the article does anyone say "bicycles are more dangerous than terrorism".
When I asked for examples of scaremongering I was looking for things from the actual article, rather than paraphrasing or making things up.