The article implicitly attributes 214 additional road casualties to the 7/7 attacks. The article only mentions one alternative form of transport prior to this, its one and only statistic.
Strikes me as lazy at best, deliberately misleading at worst. Anyone dissecting the study is likely to be very much in the minority of the readership.
The article implicitly attributes 214 additional road casualties to the 7/7 attacks. The article only mentions one alternative form of transport prior to this, its one and only statistic.
Strikes me as lazy at best, deliberately misleading at worst. Anyone dissecting the study is likely to be very much in the minority of the readership.
I think this is what I think.