Bicycles more dangerous than terrorism?

To frame these findings in sweeping statements such as “But if you asked which killed more people ion [sic] the last 10 years in London, international terrorism, or bicycles, the answer would definitely be bicycles," does not necessarily discredit the research and resultant paper, but it certainly shows the newspaper article to be poorly written and worthy of criticism.

While I would agree the article is not an in depth digestion of the original paper, I would say it conveys the general theme fairly well.

The point about cycling accidents claiming more lives than terrorism is simple a fact and entirely relevant to the study.