The article is purposefuly obtuse and intentionaly incendiary, with the intention of generating attention to the article rather than the subject matter.
Can you be specific, can you point to what specifically in the article that you consider 'incendiary' ?
There may be a few facts in there but how relevant are they to anything?
Which facts in the piece do you feel are not relevant to the article ?
Can you be specific, can you point to what specifically in the article that you consider 'incendiary' ?
Which facts in the piece do you feel are not relevant to the article ?