Bicycles more dangerous than terrorism?

In what sense ? Can you be specific ?

I have just read the study that the article was reporting on (it's only 16 pages), it is an entirely reasoned and balanced study, meeting all normal scientific criteria with clear explanation of methodology, figures used and references.

The silly knee-jerk reactions are just that, Moving Target/Buffalo Bill's reading of the article is just silly - an entirely misguided emotional response to a pretty interesting study. That Moving Target could put two articles up - which come to little more than name calling - and then admit to not having bothered reading the study is frankly embarrassing !

Ach, you know, I mean in the usual 'badly written' way. I am not particularly commenting on the underlying research, which I'm sure is sound, if you say so. But it has been undoubtedly sloppily communicated. And mummy MUST I give examples? :( I have a kitten on my lap which is impeding my typing somewhat. Would it work if I said IMO, or even, IMHO? Would that get me off having to 'prove' anything?