There is another argument (which I don't subscribe to because I look like a weirdo anyway) which goes like this:
More people looking normal and less like weirdy cyclists (i.e. lycra clad and helmeted/high-viz jacket and helmeted - because most people who wear helmets are either wearing lycra or high-viz) = more non-cyclists start cycling because they think 'hey I don't have to look like a weirdo cyclist' = more cyclists on the roads = drivers more used to cyclists + less drivers = safer roads for all. Hurrah!
I'm definitely aware of (the concept of) the dehumanising effect of helmet use, but wonder if it's outweighed by the dehumanising effect of riding a bike, in the current UK sociological climate.
Maybe someone on here who was a motorcyclist before and after helmet use became compulsory could shed some light on whether they feel other road users have become less sympathetic since the change...
I'm definitely aware of (the concept of) the dehumanising effect of helmet use, but wonder if it's outweighed by the dehumanising effect of riding a bike, in the current UK sociological climate.
Maybe someone on here who was a motorcyclist before and after helmet use became compulsory could shed some light on whether they feel other road users have become less sympathetic since the change...