Nah no problem, I could discuss cameras for hours! (although I'm in work at the moment)
To be honest, there isn't much difference between the two, both have auto settings, similar lenses etc. Looking at the Flickr images for the MJU, it seems to give standard c41 a little vintage saturation but subtle, not as much as xpro does, but I'm yet to use the camera myself so I don't know any of the little quirks it may have. The XA2 is handy for different lighting situations as its internal lightmeter decides the shutter speeds, leaving you to simply set the ASA and focus (pretty much why I use it for redscale). The XA/XA1/XA2/XA3 cameras also have handy attachable flashes that don't affect the size of the camera drastically (a good choice for taking a camera on a night out). The XA first model is a rangefinder, and is a lot more expensive and desirable.
Nah no problem, I could discuss cameras for hours! (although I'm in work at the moment)
To be honest, there isn't much difference between the two, both have auto settings, similar lenses etc. Looking at the Flickr images for the MJU, it seems to give standard c41 a little vintage saturation but subtle, not as much as xpro does, but I'm yet to use the camera myself so I don't know any of the little quirks it may have. The XA2 is handy for different lighting situations as its internal lightmeter decides the shutter speeds, leaving you to simply set the ASA and focus (pretty much why I use it for redscale). The XA/XA1/XA2/XA3 cameras also have handy attachable flashes that don't affect the size of the camera drastically (a good choice for taking a camera on a night out). The XA first model is a rangefinder, and is a lot more expensive and desirable.