Bike Anti-Porn - When Things Go Wrong

Thanks, I double checked just now, and it's definitely, and I remember how loose it was before compared to now.

No innuendo intended.

Have you been out on it yet? How did the cycle training go?

Have you been out on it yet? How did the cycle training go?

I've been out on it on my road, and about on the pavement, she rides beautiful (geared)
Re: Training, not heard back from the guys at TFL or CTUK, so got Oliver to chase up the CTUK, as I'm getting impatient.

Here is how it is as of 2mins ago, it looks tighter to me? If not, let me know and I'll go about fixing it

(Sorry its a mobile picture)

you posted your own bike in anti-porn

you posted your own bike in anti-porn

I've noticed that. And?

I was explaining the saddle to the handlebars position. Is that a problem?

I've been out on it on my road, and about on the pavement, she rides beautiful (geared)
Re: Training, not heard back from the guys at TFL or CTUK, so got Oliver to chase up the CTUK, as I'm getting impatient.

Lil, I cannot says this strongly enough, if you're inexperience, TAKE THE LANE.

take at least nearly half the lane when you ride, this way car is less likely to hit you or overtake you leaving little room.

Lane? Cycling lane? What? You could have PM'd this ;) topic's offsubject last few posts.

Which reminds me, what do you people think of the Bruisers bikes?

Here is how it is as of 2mins ago, it looks tighter to me? If not, let me know and I'll go about fixing it

(Sorry its a mobile picture)

Looks like youve sorted it mostly now, but the general rule of thumb is to put the chain on the two largest sprockets (front & rear) then shorten the chain as much as possible. The rear mech should still have a bit of spring in it in this position. Your components are well used so some weakening of the springs is to be expected.

To James Donohue
Are you aware if you take a photograph of anything inculding this, and upload it on the internet it will be criticised, even if you don't agree?

People are entitled to their opinions. I would not expect cyclists who want the lightest bikes possible to be interested in a utility bike with a 45 kilogram cargo capacity.

All I was saying is that Mr. baddesigner posted my pics on this site without giving my fake name (although he did give a link to my "open letter" post on bikeforums dot net).

Every bike has it's pros and cons. I believe everyone should have several bikes. Use the right bike for the job.

Fair enough.

I actually like this for some peculiar reason. There I said it.

This however is utter wankenschaft! My poor eyes!

why are those bikes so ugly? Cinelli you used to be cool!

Not really my style, but i see nothing wrong with that.

No wonder people finish like this
YouTube - Sian Welch & Wendy Ingraham - The Crawl - 1997

are they on ketamine?

it's the wank paul crank and gold chan that ruins ut

...and ugly paintwork and colour co-ordination

I just hate the wall...

http://www.fixedgeargallery.com/2009/aug/4/GregoryKrouse.htm#image_1
http://www.fixedgeargallery.com/2009/aug/4/ColinT.Anderson.htm
http://www.fixedgeargallery.com/2009/aug/4/Gabor.Dravay_alcoa.htm that one is ridiculous!!!

it's the wank paul crank and gold chan that ruins ut

actually the gold chain is those KMC titanium nitrate coating one, and it's only in gold, quiest and smoothest (and lightest I think) chain in the market, expensive thought.

the last one's quite interesting. perhaps it would look better with chromed/alloy bits (ie. post, stem, handlebar and the chainset) and some leather tape. those joints are awful - they look like they're wrapped in a handful of brown hair fetch out of the u-bend.

actually the gold chain is those KMC titanium nitrate coating one, and it's only in gold, quiest and smoothest (and lightest I think) chain in the market, expensive thought.

+1 they are superbe *

KMC titanium nitride coating

Fixed

Not really my style, but i see nothing wrong with that.

Its the combination of parts. All really flashy but look totally gash together. I think that is the essence of anti-porn, stuff thats really expensive but totally tasteless.

Black hson + vigorelli = fail

Paul cranks + vigorelli = fail

Paul cranks + gold chain + hson = triple fail.

Its one nasty setup.

Hi,
I didn't mean to barge in, but I discovered that some pictures of mine were used in this thread, back on page 57. These are pictures of Utility Bikes. Some of them are single speed, yes, but I don't know what they are doing here.
I'm not going to complain that these are copyright violations, this site's "fair use" policy is okay with me, but I wasn't given credit for the photographs.
This came to my attention when I checked my "stats" on photobucket dot com, and londonfgss dot com was listed as the site my photographs were linked to/from.

The "Fiberglass Ladies Bicycle" was designed by my Daughter Mellisa. I shot the photographs.

There is some video of these bikes, which I felt was important, because some people have said they thought the bikes were impossible to ride, as if for display only. To see the video, you must go to youtube dot com and
do a search for "Fiberglass Ladies Bicycle".

Again, these are utility bikes, and what appears to be an aerodynamic fairing is actually a cargo box.

Thank you for giving me credit for the photographs;

James Donohue

NFA Vehicles

hotbike at hotmail dot com

Your taking the mic are'nt ya,those pics are so funny,it looks like a kid made it,and you sold one for $1200,was the person blind.

i looked at this thread

[ame="http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=368985"]Fiberglass Bicycle (Open Letter) - Bike Forums[/ame]

and the bike in post 15 looks like a right POS.Anyone paying upto $3000 must be bonkers.And oyu fitting car headlamps and bumpers too.I can't stop laughing at how serious your taking this.Deffo got to be one of the better examples on this thread,hehe.

Some of these pics should go in the porn thread

http://s134.photobucket.com/albums/q119/hotbike/

Personal i will buy this off you to fit to my bike.