Vote NO on proposition 6!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gb_qHP7VaZE

Whatever happened to the Popular People's Front of Bike Polo?

Splitters.

Mike's on the ball I reckon.

There seem to be few downsides to keeping the league and Euro qualifiers separate, yet there are many situations where the auto-qualification could cause problems come the Euros?

But a vote's a vote...

The platform of my revolutionary opposition party is to ban polotics.

The platform of my revolutionary opposition party is to ban polotics.

Your obfuscations only serve to high-light your crypto-chukkaism. Your so-called revolutionary platform is no more than a front for your anti-polo counter-revolution.

Fair point, but do we need 3 public treads to do that?

No, probably not, but you definitely need to install a spell-check on your browser...

Your obfuscations only serve to high-light your crypto-chukkaism. Your so-called revolutionary platform is no more than a front for your anti-polo counter-revolution.

Polo is the people(with bikes)'s sport. The revolutionary oppolosition party (new name). Have no intention to change this.

That being said, we will not stand for polotics. The poloist-milita will be present at every throw-in, league game, and tournament across London... Watching.

Watching.

And drinking?

Polo is the people(with bikes)'s sport. The revolutionary oppolosition party (new name). Have no intention to change this.

That being said, we will not stand for polotics. The poloist-milita will be present at every throw-in, league game, and tournament across London... Watching.

you mean this people, but with bikes????

The new regime will indeed look favourably on drinking.

Polo is the people(with bikes)'s sport. The revolutionary oppolosition party (new name). Have no intention to change this.

That being said, we will not stand for polotics. The poloist-milita will be present at every throw-in, league game, and tournament across London... Watching.

Your so-called manifesto is nothing but a tissue of fabrications, false-hoods and other alliterations which I can't think of right now. This is nothing but a t-boners charter, masquerading as an appeal to common-sense. Let no-one be taken in by this.

Can someone add me to the group, I would like to give my opinion too (unless that's not allowed for a noob), but I don't want to comment on the issue until I've voted.

The new regime will indeed look favourably on drinking.
Awesome. Where do I sign up?

Can someone add me to the group, I would like to give my opinion too (unless that's not allowed for a noob), but I don't want to comment on the issue until I've voted.

Noobs aren't allowed opinions until they have bought Gabes at least 3 pints of Addlestone's and a bottle of ginger beer.

Noobs aren't allowed opinions until they have bought the rotten applease at least 3 pints of Addlestone's and a bottle of ginger beer (each).
This is an awesome rule.

Your so-called manifesto is nothing but a tissue of fabrications, false-hoods and other alliterations which I can't think of right now. This is nothing but a t-boners charter, masquerading as an appeal to common-sense. Let no-one be taken in by this.

Obvious Neo-new-Whiggism. Vice masquerading as virtue. I question whether you actually even own a polo hammer.

(The new regime's flag will be the polo hammer and sickle).

PEOPLE UNITE!

Awesome! I want the t-shirt...

in the mallet some holes please

I cannot believe this thread has been started. Its very sad that someone would feel the need to influence others in this way, when we have agreed to vote on things as a community.

Please vote however you want to vote!

For the record, it was me who originally raised an issue with them being connected. I haven't voted yet and this is making me think I should vote yes, as the more I think about it, the more I think its a good idea for the winning team to have it as a prize/ something as a goal to work towards. The team that finish top surely would qualify for the euros anyway.

If that team happens to still be together and all other teams who wish to enter the Euros are playing in the league and in same configuration. The last league showed us that this simply isn't the case.

I move that propostion 6 be recast with a simply yes/no option.
If "Yes" is the winning vote we should then hold a vote regarding how many teams should automatically qualify.

;888728']Awesome! I want the t-shirt...
I also want this t-shirt.

I move that propostion 6 be recast with a simply yes/no option.
If "Yes" is the winning vote we should then hold a vote regarding how many teams should automatically qualify.

I move against this. as the two yes options are both yes. There should be no reason for a re-vote unless both the yes options are close or a tie.

If that team happens to still be together and all other teams who wish to enter the Euros are playing in the league and in same configuration. The last league showed us that this simply isn't the case.

I move that propostion 6 be recast with a simply yes/no option.
If "Yes" is the winning vote we should then hold a vote regarding how many teams should automatically qualify.

I second this motion. Other questions have second parts that will be voted upon depending upon the original vote. Having multiple "yes" options is superfluous when in reality this is a yes/no question.

I think the two yeses can be counted as one. It's just simpler and it's already done.