After being surprised at the price of a used bicycle, Robin Goldstein takes a (very brief) look at prices of used cars and prices of used bikes in some US cities, finding a negative correlation.
I wonder if the correlation is genuine. More striking, to me, is that the cost of a bicycle is deemed outrageously high, despite being on average 4% of that of a car. When used as a vehicle for commuting and everyday general use, it seems pretty clear that an investment in a quality bike will pay dividends. Indeed, that could be a driving factor in the market price of 2nd hand bikes - where journeys by bicycle are more common, the price of a bike may be higher, not because demand is higher, but because people value a quality bicycle higer (witness the poor sales of $200 BSOs in Portland).
Anyway, don't have the time to think too much further, but struck me as interesting. What are your thoughts..?
Well, that thread title should put off uninterested parties.
So, an interesting post on the Freakonomics blog:
http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/17/bicycle-inflation-in-paradise
After being surprised at the price of a used bicycle, Robin Goldstein takes a (very brief) look at prices of used cars and prices of used bikes in some US cities, finding a negative correlation.
I wonder if the correlation is genuine. More striking, to me, is that the cost of a bicycle is deemed outrageously high, despite being on average 4% of that of a car. When used as a vehicle for commuting and everyday general use, it seems pretty clear that an investment in a quality bike will pay dividends. Indeed, that could be a driving factor in the market price of 2nd hand bikes - where journeys by bicycle are more common, the price of a bike may be higher, not because demand is higher, but because people value a quality bicycle higer (witness the poor sales of $200 BSOs in Portland).
Anyway, don't have the time to think too much further, but struck me as interesting. What are your thoughts..?