You are reading a single comment by @tynan and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • "Cycling declined when the law was introduced while I was in primary school. It bounced back though and cycling is bigger than ever now."

    Here you go . . . (graph shows hypothetical - time horizontal - cycling uptake vertical - illustrative only.)

    Cycling is generally rising, which leads to an increase in cycle accidents.

    Due to the increase in cycling accidents - a mandatory helmet use law is introduced [A].

    Cycling uptake declines - but then from [B] onwards starts to recover (the 'bounce back') and then goes on to become bigger than ever (point [C] onwards).

    You could read this as - an initial rejection of the mandatory helmet use law . . . then it's eventual acceptance, after which point it has no meaningful impact on cycling uptake - or even a positive effect ('bigger now than ever').

About

Avatar for tynan @tynan started