G20 demonstrations

which is why i referred specifically to articles about people who admit to breaking the law having a whinge about the standard police response to the laws they broke.

The fact that a seemingly unconcerned individual died near by is neither here nor there, to the facts of the above cases. It is an argument that will be used to sway emotion and disrupt the course of logic dealing with the facts of the case.

It "sucks hard" when you want to riot and the police get in the way, they totally should just let you "smash shit up" until your ready to go back to art school/ SOAS. The police protecting property, and trying to keep the peace is "totaly un-kewl". Maybe when you show off your "riot bruse" later you can "get laid" by a "crust girl".

Is being conservative the hip new thing in Williamsburg, Chris?