hmmm, ii just watched dr quantums piece on it on you tube. interesting but it doesnt convince me.
This is like someone who has never spoken Aramaic, coming back after 7 minutes of briefly skimming through an acient text and telling us:* "like I said, it's just all nonsense, it's not a real language, the words don't even make sense"*.
:P
When you say you are not convinced, can you be specific, what part of the theory do you find unconvincing.
the observing in this experiment influenced the outcome, but still, not the thing.
This is like someone who has never spoken Aramaic, coming back after 7 minutes of briefly skimming through an acient text and telling us:* "like I said, it's just all nonsense, it's not a real language, the words don't even make sense"*.
:P
When you say you are not convinced, can you be specific, what part of the theory do you find unconvincing.
What is 'the thing' ?
How did the observation influence the outcome ??