Glossy photos of girls on bikes!

Posted on
Page
of 184
  • I have no problem with seeing picks of naked women but, there are women on this forum who probably find that inapropreate and also bosses at work who just happening to be looking over forumgers sholders.

  • there are women on this forum who probably find that inapropreate and also bosses at work who just happening to be looking over forumgers sholders.

    Those are both bad reasons for the de facto rule. The good reason is the tide of tasteless porn which could be unleashed without the rule.

  • I'm fine with seeing Axe Wounds, perhaps should be a link instead with NSFW next to it? Just my 2p here.

  • Attack of the 50 foot supermodel.

  • Those are both bad reasons for the de facto rule. The good reason is the tide of tasteless porn which could be unleashed without the rule.

    Why are they bad reasons?

  • I'm fine with seeing Axe Wounds, perhaps should be a link instead with NSFW next to it? Just my 2p here.

    "axe wounds" that made me laugh :)

  • Why are they bad reasons?

    First, women who get uppity about pix of naked chix deserve to be annoyed, not mollycoddled. Second, if you're afraid of getting caught looking at work, that probably means you should be getting on with what your boss is actually paying you for, not wasting time on a forum. That Femjoy image is hardly going to be more troublesome than the Suicide Girls one which passed unremarked a couple of days ago anyway, so it would be stretch to say that this thread was made SFW by the simple removal of the "visible labial detail", as the BBFC describe such things.

  • Still think linking the image than it being posted as an image with NSFW would work the best, so women who dont like cunts/people at work know to skip it.

  • Still think linking the image than it being posted as an image with NSFW would work the best, so women who dont like cunts/people at work know to skip it.

    The slash in place of a more conventional conjunction suggests that you are listing alternative nomenclatures for the same entity, with which sentiment most of us will have concurred from time to time.

  • This is Mitre Tester. No, seriously, it is.


    1 Attachment

    • wac.jpg
  • Still think linking the image than it being posted as an image with NSFW would work the best, so women who dont like cunts/people at work know to skip it.

    Worth noting that women who don't like cunts don't hang around this forum for long.

    Ba

    Doom

    Tish

  • Just fyi, I never refer vagina as vagina, I always say cunt or downstairs!

  • Still think linking the image than it being posted as an image with NSFW would work the best

    Apparently, that's also frowned upon.

    NSFW

  • Just fyi, I never refer vagina as vagina, I always say cunt or downstairs!

    It's common practice in modern medicine too.

  • Just fyi, I never refer vagina as vagina, I always say cunt or downstairs!

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00kwkj7

  • It's common practice in modern medicine too.

    I heard they are now using Fanny Spanner to refer to a cock as well these days.

  • wiganwill
    looks like terry richardson !
    without tatoos

  • This is Mitre Tester. No, seriously, it is.

    I've put a new self-pic up for you to jerk off to in the One For The Ladies thread

  • http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00kwkj7

    I don't think I have ever heard a woman refer to her vagina as a penis .... (yes I know I am deliberately taking it kinda outta context).

    The words 'vulva' and 'vagina' are anatomically correct but don't seem to be widely used, whereas the word 'penis' is.

  • Apparently, that's also frowned upon.

    NSFW

    nice trim

  • that doubles for Italian sophistication.........

  • yeah no muff or i'll get fired....

About

Glossy photos of girls on bikes!

Posted by Avatar for fasteddy @fasteddy

Actions