Giro D'Italia - where can I watch it?

It too late at night for me to have a fully working sarcasm filter, so I assuming you are being sarcastic, and this would be my answer ....

Suspicion and proof are two very different things.

It is understandable to investigate someone if there is suspicion, but not to label them guilty without any proof. If there is proof someone has cheated throw the book at them, that is fair enough but not before.

Don't really see why you may disagree with this.

but in the recent past nothing was done about it, a few scapegoats like pantani but still it went on, cover-ups long winded legal processes, different countries laws, pressure from sponsors, the weakness of the UCI all contributed to a situation for doping to continue. which is why there are riders competing today who are dopers but were only 99% caught so got away with it. armstrong being a good example.