72.7mph!

just imagine the gravel rash you'd get at that speed
you'd be down to the bone !
eeeekk

I'm sure I read somewhere that at 60mph bone erodes at an inch a second. Even with a helmet on at those speeds you'd be in a lot of trouble if you came off. I'd love to see it live though.

Poor Armstrong. He's showing his age isn't he? Bit of rain and he's bleating like a new born lamb about the nasty conditions. He needs to HTFU!

Poor Armstrong. He's showing his age isn't he? Bit of rain and he's bleating like a new born lamb about the nasty conditions. He needs to HTFU!

You took the words right out of my mouth:

http://www.londonfgss.com/post695925.html

:)

Glad we're in agreement Oliver. ;-)

I've ridden that road twice, and apart from 4 kms at the top of the pass, it's a wide main road with very few corners and a great surface. Armstrong's objections seem to be based on the fact that it was wet. That is the complaint of someone who's heart isn't it to me.

I've ridden that road twice, and apart from 4 kms at the top of the pass, it's a wide main road with very few corners and a great surface. Armstrong's objections seem to be based on the fact that it was wet. That is the complaint of someone who's heart isn't it to me.

Come on, Andy, don't deny the love that dare not speak its name. ;)

lance complained that they were going to fast for him
what a cock !

should have stayed quit mate

Poor Pedro. :S

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2009/may09/may17news