why? were you in a london paper talking with authority about something you don't understand?
I really can't see why you've got such antagonism to the guy in the article.
He wasn't talking with authority about something he didn't understand, he was answering a few basic questions about his commute - which I presume he knows more about than you.
I really can't see why you've got such antagonism to the guy in the article.
He wasn't talking with authority about something he didn't understand, he was answering a few basic questions about his commute - which I presume he knows more about than you.