wow where did richard cheese come from
we have our very own oxford prof on the forum ... welcome sir
the whole basis of the rapid rise in climate has come from 200 years worth of measurement and archealogical and geological findings both of which i presume there will be an margain of error in the data
how can we make a true conclusion based on data from the last 200 years when the globe has been reacting in some form of an equilibrium for billions of years the time scale is too short
maybe the opening of the wilkins ice sheet will allow for a different flow of water around the globe changing temperature and regulating itself
No, the data is based on several hundred thousand years of proxy measurements, compared to the recording collected over 200 years.
I find the work done by these 'scientists' to very thorough and very sound in it's practice. They are experts in their field acknowledged as such by their contemporaries regardless of opinion clashes. I therefore am inclined to listen to what they have to say on the matter - rather than the some ill-informed based 'climate-experts'.
I have read arguments by scientists who disagree with what is the paradigm view, and some of them make very good arguments too, but their arguments don't really stand up to too much scrutiny.
Personally I don't give a flying fuck what happens to the planet, I just can't believe the amount of ill-informed nonsense that people spout on this matter -the good thing that comes out of this is that people are beginning to explore this more deeply instead of listening to randoms, but it is a really unfortunate fact that the scientific journals are unavailable to the greater population.
No, the data is based on several hundred thousand years of proxy measurements, compared to the recording collected over 200 years.
I find the work done by these 'scientists' to very thorough and very sound in it's practice. They are experts in their field acknowledged as such by their contemporaries regardless of opinion clashes. I therefore am inclined to listen to what they have to say on the matter - rather than the some ill-informed based 'climate-experts'.
I have read arguments by scientists who disagree with what is the paradigm view, and some of them make very good arguments too, but their arguments don't really stand up to too much scrutiny.
Personally I don't give a flying fuck what happens to the planet, I just can't believe the amount of ill-informed nonsense that people spout on this matter -the good thing that comes out of this is that people are beginning to explore this more deeply instead of listening to randoms, but it is a really unfortunate fact that the scientific journals are unavailable to the greater population.