Glossy photos of girls on bikes!

is it possible that the majority of the so-called problem exists only in your febrile imagination

So you're saying, like, it's all in my head? Holy crap - this is getting really messed up now.

Am I really here? Do YOU exist?

mooks, how would you feel if there were two threads, one with pictures of girls on bikes and one with pictures of blokes on bikes ?

or combine the two?

• add a hug :)
  
  

^

I always think it really precarious when people do that. Worried they are going to fall off and hurt themselves.

Me too. But then I also think it's cute as hell and cute more than makes up for the danger.

^ it does.

yup.

Uh-huh, super cute to the max...

You like this, huh ?, is this what you want, yeah ?, you like this, do you, do you, you like it huh ?

a straight up 7 out of 10!

I'm not sure about that dirty sanchez.

i think it adds a certain dark side to her otherwise very feminine apeal

hmmm...

http://www.aviancompanions.com/Cockatoo-on-Bicycle.gif

birds on bikes?

So you're saying, like, it's all in my head? Holy crap - this is getting really messed up now.

Am I really here? Do YOU exist?

Nice diversionary tactic, going down the metaphysical route, but the issue is a concrete one.

Of course, your behaviour is rational, it's just your incentives which are perverse. Your job relies on persuading your paymasters (ultimately, the public) that there is a problem, yet your job is to solve that problem. If you do your job successfully, you will soon be unemployed. Therefore, you behave rationally in your own interest not by solving actual problems but by trying to find more problems, and if necessary create them where they didn't previously exist. If you can create a new problem and then solve it, you get to meet your performance targets without effecting any real change, so at the end of the year you can still cite the (mainly fictitious) problems which you haven't yet solved to justify your continued employment.

The above is a general critique of all public servants, and is not specific to your area of interest. In your own field, the Equalities agenda has been an unmitigated disaster wherever it has been allowed to practise its pernicious separatist dogma. There is a corrupt codependent relationship between separatist special interests and professional troublemakers like yourself, and neither party is any better than the other, since they now both draw on public funds.

Now, a lady cyclist, for the people using this thread for its intended purpose
http://jorj.co.uk/gallery/gal/cycle/cycle120.jpg

The above is a general critique of all public servants, and is not specific to your area of interest. In your own field, the Equalities agenda has been an unmitigated disaster wherever it has been allowed to practise its pernicious separatist dogma. There is a corrupt codependent relationship between separatist special interests and professional troublemakers like yourself, and neither party is any better than the other, since they now both draw on public funds.
[URL="http://jorj.co.uk/gallery/gal/cycle/cycle120.jpg"][/URL]

Man, that's a lot of hot air - where's your balloon, bud? The one with "It's political correctness gone mad!" on it?

Man, that's a lot of hot air - where's your balloon, bud? The one with "It's political correctness gone mad!" on it?

+1 simplistic nonsense dressed up as an argument - more yawns...

Man, that's a lot of hot air - where's your balloon, bud? The one with "It's political correctness gone mad!" on it?

The problem is not political correctness, it's political interference in private affairs regardless of the standpoint of the interfering busy body. Thomas Paine identified the problem, and it's source, 150 years before Mao invented political correctness; the main action of governments is to promote their own interests, at the expense of the general population. One of the principal means used by governments to achieve their ends is to pretend firstly that there are great problems, and secondly that government action will solve such problems. Where authentic problems exist, they frequently originate from previous government interference, they are always grossly exagerated, and the solution to them invariably comes at the hands of common people acting with common sense, in spite of obstacles created by interfering governments.

Now, can I interest anybody in a lady cyclist...

^^^^^^^
She is hot.................

Holy shit! What a load of bollocks! You come on here blowing your 'ad hominem' trumpet and you've just based your whole critique not on my argument, but what I do for a living. I'd be saying the same thing whatever my job was - get that clear in your head for starters.

Fven better is that you haven't got a fucking clue what you're talking about!

You fail! Now fuck off and come back when you actually know what you're talking about, rather than spouting some subjective, ill-informed bullshit.

But cheers - you really brightened up my evening. I haven't heard such guff in yearrrrs...

The problem is not political correctness, it's political interference in private affairs regardless of the standpoint of the interfering busy body. Thomas Paine identified the problem, and it's source, 150 years before Mao invented political correctness; the main action of governments is to promote their own interests, at the expense of the general population. One of the principal means used by governments to achieve their ends is to pretend firstly that there are great problems, and secondly that government action will solve such problems. Where authentic problems exist, they frequently originate from previous government interference, they are always grossly exagerated, and the solution to them invariably comes at the hands of common people acting with common sense, in spite of obstacles created by interfering governments.

Now, can I interest anybody in a lady cyclist...

can I interest someone in fancy haircuts...

you've just based your whole critique not on my argument

Did you have an argument? Sorry, I must have missed that, but I wasn't even trying to engage with whatever you might have wanted to argue before you got sidetracked and failed to even address my previous comments. You might remember that, I said professional troublemakers like you have a self interested agenda which leads them to ignore the reality that they are just wasting their lives and ruining other people's. You drifted off into a series of sarcastic remarks which didn't make any attempt to refute that proposition. It's all up there in the earlier posts, maybe you should read them.

The rest of you, ignore the commie baiting and enjoy the lady cyclists

+1 simplistic nonsense dressed up as an argument - more yawns...

Plus it gives me typing practice and allows Mooks, who is not an angry man, you should know, to tell me to fuck off, so it's not a complete waste of time.

shit! ...bollocks! ...fucking...fuck...bullshit.

Such a mild mannered chap, you'll all agree

you both have small penis's no matter how much you wave them at each other.

I 100% approve of this thread

I 100% approve of this thread

it's A1 kwality