i already covered this in my post.. it's a pity you fail to comprehend the far more pointless macho posturing you encouraged.
It wasn't entirely accidental that I used a rating system based on DoI scoring; look at the women on that show, and you'll barely find one whose first qualification for a career in show business wasn't her pleasing looks
i don't get this bit but then again I'm not interested anyway really.
If you want to get on a moral crusade against sexism, it would be better to start with the whole of Hollywood, television and pop music, where talent is no substitute for a 'great set of cans' if you want to get on.
not it wouldn't, I don't care about hollywood, tv or pop music thanks. I do care about bikes and people who are dedicated to cycling. I don't care about your ideas on the fuckability of women one jot.
To waste as much time and effort as some obviously have on a little internet backwater where a great many of the supposedly objectionable posts are made by people whose intent is already to satirise 'Neanderthal' attitudes demonstrates a complete failure of a sense of proportion.
hmm.. bit of a mirror situation really if you step up though isn't it.
If you really object to men rating women, get thee to a nunnery. How the hell do you think we, alongside pretty much every other vertebrate species, select prospective reproductive partners? And of course, the reverse is true; females rate males, although in modern humans the rating is often less directly correlated with physical attributes.
I don't object to men rating women in terms of their attraction, yes I'm quite aware how it all works thanks. what I object to is Chris Moyles listeners like you who come along and proceed to behave in as cliched and backwaterlike manner in an arena where you figure you'll get some points with "ver lads" by going on about how "fit" girls are and making it all about you and your view of them. It's a fucking cliche mate, you're not being ironic or shit, you're just showing you're a certain type of male whose attitude I have found to be consistently contemptible over the years. I've been in bars where a small group of "lads" huddle in a corner checking all the girls out as they walk by and call out their marks out of ten for them. I've been in offices where a new girl walks past and all the men bang instantly on about how "she'd get it". It 's fuckin saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad mate. Simple as that.
what I objected to here was the reduction of a group of champion cyclists to the rating of them in terms of the sexual attraction they held for you as a posturing heterosexual male and whether they would "get it". just as my objection to the thread you started about what men's cocks look like in their cycling lycra centred upon the reduction of cycling and champion cyclists to "heeheheheheheheheheheeheeeee look I can see his willy". Get with it dude, it's 2009 and I presume you're an adult now.
i already covered this in my post.. it's a pity you fail to comprehend the far more pointless macho posturing you encouraged.
i don't get this bit but then again I'm not interested anyway really.
not it wouldn't, I don't care about hollywood, tv or pop music thanks. I do care about bikes and people who are dedicated to cycling. I don't care about your ideas on the fuckability of women one jot.
hmm.. bit of a mirror situation really if you step up though isn't it.
I don't object to men rating women in terms of their attraction, yes I'm quite aware how it all works thanks. what I object to is Chris Moyles listeners like you who come along and proceed to behave in as cliched and backwaterlike manner in an arena where you figure you'll get some points with "ver lads" by going on about how "fit" girls are and making it all about you and your view of them. It's a fucking cliche mate, you're not being ironic or shit, you're just showing you're a certain type of male whose attitude I have found to be consistently contemptible over the years. I've been in bars where a small group of "lads" huddle in a corner checking all the girls out as they walk by and call out their marks out of ten for them. I've been in offices where a new girl walks past and all the men bang instantly on about how "she'd get it". It 's fuckin saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad mate. Simple as that.
what I objected to here was the reduction of a group of champion cyclists to the rating of them in terms of the sexual attraction they held for you as a posturing heterosexual male and whether they would "get it". just as my objection to the thread you started about what men's cocks look like in their cycling lycra centred upon the reduction of cycling and champion cyclists to "heeheheheheheheheheheeheeeee look I can see his willy". Get with it dude, it's 2009 and I presume you're an adult now.