Why should I attempt to have a 'rational discussion' with you? Your posts show that you have entered into an evangelistic tirade and that your mind is as closed as those you rail against. You accuse me of arrogance but assume that I should be interested in your concerns, then, in a further bout of hypocrisy, you state that your arguments are valid. It is unfortunate that your anger precludes you from 'rational discussion' as it renders further discourse pointless.
Look at it this way - I haven't resorted to anything emotive, nor have I resorted to mudslinging. I've put forward my point of view in a rational way and expect the same in return - but no - what I get back is "Hey, look at this guy - he started a thread about chainlines - what a dork!"
It's a certain type of arrogance comes with a suggestion that you have no need to justify your actions - more people than me are noticeably concerned about the message this thread sends out - yet you choose not to either allay those concerns or accept that what you've done has the potential to offend.
And I find that perhaps more worrying than the pictures themselves.
Look at it this way - I haven't resorted to anything emotive, nor have I resorted to mudslinging. I've put forward my point of view in a rational way and expect the same in return - but no - what I get back is "Hey, look at this guy - he started a thread about chainlines - what a dork!"
It's a certain type of arrogance comes with a suggestion that you have no need to justify your actions - more people than me are noticeably concerned about the message this thread sends out - yet you choose not to either allay those concerns or accept that what you've done has the potential to offend.
And I find that perhaps more worrying than the pictures themselves.