-
• #1452
Me likes her legs. She (3) appears to be the only one with decent cans as well.
Honestly, some of you are completely clueless and classless- behaving like a bunch of social degenerates, putting your orders in for this number and that girl... I mean seriously... how old are you ??
that kind of behavior is grotesque and pitiful, its 1 thing to admire the aesthetics of the female form- or male for that matter, absolutely nothing wrong with that...the body is indeed beautiful... but there is a defining line drawn between posting and admiring respectfully and just plain tacky & tasteless behavior ....
its horrendous that in this day and age their are grown men who still refer to woman this way.
If you applied half the energy you spend talking BS on here picking girls for the look of their legs or their " cans " ?? and invested that into your real life relationships and the girls you meet ....you might just get somewhere
pathetic
-
• #1453
Honestly, some of you are completely clueless and classless- behaving like a bunch of social degenerates, putting your orders in for this number and that girl... I mean seriously... how old are you ??
that kind of behavior is grotesque and pitiful, its 1 thing to admire the aesthetics of the female form- or male for that matter, absolutely nothing wrong with that...the body is indeed beautiful... but there is a defining line drawn between posting and admiring respectfully and just plain tacky & tasteless behavior ....
its horrendous that in this day and age their are grown men who still refer to woman this way.
If you applied half the energy you spend talking BS on here picking girls for the look of their legs or their " cans " ?? and invested that into your real life relationships and the girls you meet ....you might just get somewhere
pathetic
So I guess you're not getting any then?
-
• #1454
she has a point.
-
• #1455
So I guess you're not getting any then?
typical response from someone who is clearly clueless
-
• #1456
typical response from someone who is clearly clueless
If we're looking for clueless, a search back throught he thread for all the other vain attempts to raise the tone through the medium of vitriolic dissertations on sexual politics might suggest a degree of self reflection is in order. In other words, you're wasting your time, you might as well get back in the kitchen.
-
• #1457
Im entitled to voice my opinion,its very abundantly clear you know very little about women or respect. In light of your " boys in lycra cock thread" no more need be said.
as you were...
-
• #1458
So sorry, please disregard my clueless and classless degenerate comment earlier.... I have no idea what has come over me. I shall get myself back to my corner and not come out till I learns myself some manners. I'm 39 BTW. How you doin'?
-
• #1459
If we're looking for clueless, a search back throught he thread for all the other vain attempts to raise the tone through the medium of vitriolic dissertations on sexual politics might suggest a degree of self reflection is in order. In other words, you're wasting your time, you might as well get back in the kitchen.
What a fucking PRICK! 'get back in the kitchen' . . . your parents were clearly mud eating nethanderal's to raise you with such a warped view of the world, either that or you're just a cunt!! This entire thread has lost the forum so much respect it's pathetic.
-
• #1460
I liked the cock thread.
-
• #1461
nethanderal's
I agree his comment is bollocks....but am i allowed to laugh at that word? :)
-
• #1462
well they been dead for ice age, so why not?
-
• #1463
Laugh at the cunt who thinks like the earliest form of 'man' and probably has the social skills of one too!
-
• #1464
I think this thread is good. I like looking at sexy women and I like looking at bikes. The best photos on this thread are the photos of the profetional femail cyclists. The fact that they are good looking and that they do what I love to do (cycling) makes them more appleing. I am very respectfull of women but I also like photos of good looking women.
Men will always make lude coments about how they would like to do this or that to a serton young lady. It is a way of male bonding, although I am not saying this is right.
As far as sexisem go's, I am sure I have been sexist before with 'get back in the kitchen' like remarks. This is banter and piss taking of an individual I know, just the same as when people take the piss out of my big nose or aporling spelling (and all the other things besides). However, this is reserved for the people (men and women) that I know well enough for them to take the piss back. The 'get back in the kitchen' remark above is offencive and disrespectfull because you dont know her and there for is seen as a genralisation of how you see all women.
Sorry for the long winded rant, you will probably think I am more of a prick than beofre. Oh well. Come up to norths and take the piss out of my big nose.
-
• #1465
I try to avoid commenting on this thread for various reasons, but I have to say that is one cute frame! Aside from the weird bar position, I love how short the head tube is, and the lovely cream and pink lugwork. Nice pretty little bike indeed.
-
• #1466
Pinkgotti, can I take the piss out of your appalling grammar and spelling?
-
• #1467
Come up to norths and take the piss out of my big nose.
Seriously....it's worth riding up that big hill for! ;)
-
• #1468
Pinkgotti, can I take the piss out of your appalling grammar and spelling?
Yes you can sir.
And its, aporling. ;)
Seriously....it's worth riding up that big hill for! ;)
Not really.
-
• #1469
you missed my point Andy....
my point is not the pixs or admiration of beautiful girls on bikes- yes, admittedly the content seems to have gone askew and there are indeed some tasteless images posted with no bikes but my point was about the reference of women......., as I said -
quote.... "its 1 thing to admire the aesthetics of the female form- or male for that matter, absolutely nothing wrong with that...the body is indeed beautiful... but there is a defining line drawn between posting and admiring respectfully and just plain tacky & tasteless behavior ...."
its the way in which some people on this thread make reference to woman as objects... picking them like in a catalog for their "cans" or legs etc... # 3 etc... referring to woman in such a way is derogatory and offensive.
we are not peices of meat with " cans"
just keep it tasteful and respectful
-
• #1470
^ No surprise there then!
-
• #1471
oi, donut..........get back in the kitchen
-
• #1472
Back in the box murtle, box.
-
• #1473
I liked the cock thread.
I noticed you were always in there :p
-
• #1474
Back in the box murtle, box.
Ahhh, the old family renunion . . . great times!
-
• #1475
Honestly, some of you are completely clueless and classless- behaving like a bunch of social degenerates, putting your orders in for this number and that girl... I mean seriously... how old are you ??
that kind of behavior is grotesque and pitiful, its 1 thing to admire the aesthetics of the female form- or male for that matter, absolutely nothing wrong with that...the body is indeed beautiful... but there is a defining line drawn between posting and admiring respectfully and just plain tacky & tasteless behavior ....
its horrendous that in this day and age their are grown men who still refer to woman this way.
If you applied half the energy you spend talking BS on here picking girls for the look of their legs or their " cans " ?? and invested that into your real life relationships and the girls you meet ....you might just get somewhere
pathetic
+1
So I guess you're not getting any then?
What? You've got to be fucking kidding me?
What a fucking PRICK! 'get back in the kitchen' . . . your parents were clearly mud eating nethanderal's to raise you with such a warped view of the world, either that or you're just a cunt!! This entire thread has lost the forum so much respect it's pathetic.
+1
its the way in which some people on this thread make reference to woman as objects... picking them like in a catalog for their "cans" or legs etc... # 3 etc... in todays society, referring to woman in such a way is derogatory and offensive.
we are not peices of meat with " cans"
+1
I'm trying not to start with this thread again - since I posted last, it's actually gone downhill.
I've had a look at some of your profiles, and it looks like some of you invariably only ever post on this thread. Now if you actually contributed to this forum, then I might feel less annoyed by your contributions to this thread, as if it was 'just a bit of banter' (oh how I love how that phrase is supposed to excuse all manner of ills) I might have understood that from other posts.
At the end of the day, it's just a bit sad if all you see when you look at a woman is a pair of tits.
Names of the girls (from the left):
Susanne Ljungskog (previous world champ)
Monica Holler
Emma Johansson (silver medal at the Beijing Olympics)
Marie Lindberg
Emma Fahlin
Karin Aune
Pretty good cyclists all of them!
From here I'll let google images be your friend.