Bike porn

extra weight? don't make me laugh! what are you? a roadie??

No, a tester (hence the name :-) )

Vanilla bike at NAHBS

+2 for eddy -1 for commerative plate :P

Vanilla bike at NAHBS

That's mince.

Want these:

http://sillgey.com/

Group Buy?

$290 per frameset in case anyone's interested?

i believe they are meant for people of round my height and above as the effective top tube is 55cm.

The guy who runs it is really nice.

What's the equivalent size of that "one size fits all" frame?

That's a great little bike, 14 should totally be stocking that.

[/QUOTE]
Tie-dye trousers ftw.

Keirin stools

^not really porn mate.

54 x 13 gearing, a 3.2 kg rear wheel and 190 mm cranks.

^not really porn mate.

I'm sure he's sorry.. Seeing as you are now the porn police, can you take me through the laws of what is/isn't porn please?

$290 per frameset in case anyone's interested?

i believe they are meant for people of round my height and above as the effective top tube is 55cm.

The guy who runs it is really nice.

Could make a good little polo bike.

^not really porn mate.

Well, maybe not but where else am I gonna post it?

54 x 13 gearing, a 3.2 kg rear wheel and 190 mm cranks.

Fast, but not really beautiful

wtf!
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_65_aiRx88Wc/Sa6B3IqXZaI/AAAAAAAABfI/W0ziUFvv2_I/s1600/IMGP4944.jpg

54 x 13 gearing, a 3.2 kg rear wheel and 190 mm cranks.

About 4 sizes too big for the rider and slacker geometry than a hookers pissflaps!

I'm sure he's sorry.. Seeing as you are now the porn police, can you take me through the laws of what is/isn't porn please?

Unlike this comment, that comment wasn't supposed to be nasty, or self righteous, or anything other than an observation.
But this is all of the above!
Fuck off you slag. I AM the mediator of this thread. Anything you post is bound to be anti, you wanker!

^not really porn mate.

I couldn't disagree more... The covers aren't a great fit tho'...

54 x 13 gearing, a 3.2 kg rear wheel and 190 mm cranks.

I think this is a bike ridden by some dutch? dude to try and break some speed record, hence the geometry - it has been put up and explained before

Well, maybe not but where else am I gonna post it?

Just thought it was a bit of an odd post, but i've seen/posted odder myself...so, comment withdrawn.

a 3.2 kg rear wheel

that's a fucking heavy wheel !

Just thought it was a bit of an odd post, but i've seen/posted odder myself...so, comment withdrawn.

ha, I know it was a bit odd, but I thought someone might enjoy it. Didn't feel like you were being self righteous at all.

I love you bruce!
hehe, i love you too.
http://www.wolfgang-menn.de/sosenka.htm

I still don't understand how Sosenka's bike was deemed legal by the UCI. If you read Michael Hutchison's excellent book, The Hour, you'll know how much hassle he had in getting his bike approved. Sosenka's is an abomination.

And I'd wager a lot of money that he was doped to the eyeballs when he broke the hour record.

i agree previous drugs charges being baned etc, but still a proper track bike, on what grounds do you think its not leagal? not picking fight just info.