-
• #27
I have 172.5 on my (main) road bike and 165 on fixed. But I'm 5'6; I would change the road ones to 165s but they're Record and pretty.
-
• #28
Most couriers run 165 on the left and 180 on the right. Come on, hipsters, fall in line.
-
• #29
165mm cranks is the fixed-gear fashion. 172.5mm is what I run on my road bike. I don't notice the difference through my legs but 165mm is definitely better for cornering on fixed-gear.
-
• #30
That's bollocks will and you know it. Only the really fast couriers do that.
-
• #31
i cant tell the differences between my 165s and 170s i mean, what is 5mm after all?
-
• #32
half a cm last time i checked
-
• #33
Most couriers run 165 on the left and 180 on the right. Come on, hipsters, fall in line.
so you can prop your bike on the kerb, right?
-
• #34
172.5 on road, 165 on fix.
just because. -
• #35
half a cm last time i checked
I reckon it is 5x10e-3 metres.
-
• #36
165 to 170 is 10 mm more diameter, 31.4159... mm more pedal movement per revolution, or your feet moving about 3% faster for the same rpm, which means your feet would have 6% more kinetic energy.
-
• #37
[QUOTE=wiganwill;542627]Most couriers run 165 on the left and 180 on the right. Come on, hipsters, fall in line.
so you can prop your bike on the kerb, right?[/QUOTE]
no, crank length affects gear ratio - the 180 is a low gear for pulling away quickly, and the 165 for zooming along.
-
• #38
^ would it not be 9% because kinectic energy is proportional to the angular frequency velocity squared?
-
• #39
^ would it not be 9% because kinectic energy is proportional to the angular frequency velocity squared?
no - if the old speed was v, the new speed is 1.03 v and the KE changes from 1/2 M v^2 to 1/2 M (1.03 v)^2 = 1/2 M 1.03^2 v^2 = 1/2 M 1.0609 v^2
-
• #40
^
Thanks, Middle School Maths Mistake there.
-
• #41
no - if the old speed was v, the new speed is 1.03 v and the KE changes from 1/2 M v^2 to 1/2 M (1.03 v)^2 = 1/2 M 1.03^2 v^2 = 1/2 M 1.0609 v^2
So, does that mean the 5mm makes a big difference, and we should be worrying about getting the perfect crank length, or can we assume the 5mm is a small distance so the difference it'll make will also be small?
-
• #42
^
It means you should ride your bike and not worry about it.
-
• #43
165 fixed 175 road. 32" inside leg.
-
• #44
right or left fiddy?
-
• #45
Now riding 165's (for last couple of days) have ridden 170's before that for two years, 175's before that for ever.
Swapped 175 ->170 because of knee trouble. 170 more comfortable because less range of motion.
Swapped 170 -> 165 because new bike came with them, but notice the difference mainly when out of the saddle, it's easier to maintain a smooth circular motion with the smaller cranks.When sitting, 165's feel much like 170's apart from slightly harder to pedal for same gear ratio (due to less moment - obviously).
Another thing: first impressions on going downhill fast, there's less tendency to bounce around in the saddle with shorter cranks.
Hope this helps.
-
• #46
165's on the commuter, 170's on the beater. Don't really notice much difference.
-
• #47
It means you should ride your bike and not worry about it.
*I *Don't, someone we both know does, though ;)
-
• #48
Basically... everyone here has an opinion, but know one really knows.
Myself included.
[165 & 170ish both fixed]
-
• #49
I know. I choose to remain silent on the matter.
-
• #50
sssshhh.
I've got 165mm cranks but they came standard on my 54cm Fuji Track. I'm small...