165 Cranks...who runs them?

Posted on
Page
of 3
Prev
/ 3
Next
  • I've got 165mm cranks but they came standard on my 54cm Fuji Track. I'm small...

  • I have 172.5 on my (main) road bike and 165 on fixed. But I'm 5'6; I would change the road ones to 165s but they're Record and pretty.

  • Most couriers run 165 on the left and 180 on the right. Come on, hipsters, fall in line.

  • 165mm cranks is the fixed-gear fashion. 172.5mm is what I run on my road bike. I don't notice the difference through my legs but 165mm is definitely better for cornering on fixed-gear.

  • That's bollocks will and you know it. Only the really fast couriers do that.

  • i cant tell the differences between my 165s and 170s i mean, what is 5mm after all?

  • half a cm last time i checked

  • Most couriers run 165 on the left and 180 on the right. Come on, hipsters, fall in line.

    so you can prop your bike on the kerb, right?

  • 172.5 on road, 165 on fix.
    just because.

  • half a cm last time i checked

    I reckon it is 5x10e-3 metres.

  • 165 to 170 is 10 mm more diameter, 31.4159... mm more pedal movement per revolution, or your feet moving about 3% faster for the same rpm, which means your feet would have 6% more kinetic energy.

  • [QUOTE=wiganwill;542627]Most couriers run 165 on the left and 180 on the right. Come on, hipsters, fall in line.

    so you can prop your bike on the kerb, right?[/QUOTE]

    no, crank length affects gear ratio - the 180 is a low gear for pulling away quickly, and the 165 for zooming along.

  • ^ would it not be 9% because kinectic energy is proportional to the angular frequency velocity squared?

  • ^ would it not be 9% because kinectic energy is proportional to the angular frequency velocity squared?

    no - if the old speed was v, the new speed is 1.03 v and the KE changes from 1/2 M v^2 to 1/2 M (1.03 v)^2 = 1/2 M 1.03^2 v^2 = 1/2 M 1.0609 v^2

  • ^

    Thanks, Middle School Maths Mistake there.

  • no - if the old speed was v, the new speed is 1.03 v and the KE changes from 1/2 M v^2 to 1/2 M (1.03 v)^2 = 1/2 M 1.03^2 v^2 = 1/2 M 1.0609 v^2

    So, does that mean the 5mm makes a big difference, and we should be worrying about getting the perfect crank length, or can we assume the 5mm is a small distance so the difference it'll make will also be small?

  • ^

    It means you should ride your bike and not worry about it.

  • 165 fixed 175 road. 32" inside leg.

  • right or left fiddy?

  • Now riding 165's (for last couple of days) have ridden 170's before that for two years, 175's before that for ever.

    Swapped 175 ->170 because of knee trouble. 170 more comfortable because less range of motion.
    Swapped 170 -> 165 because new bike came with them, but notice the difference mainly when out of the saddle, it's easier to maintain a smooth circular motion with the smaller cranks.

    When sitting, 165's feel much like 170's apart from slightly harder to pedal for same gear ratio (due to less moment - obviously).

    Another thing: first impressions on going downhill fast, there's less tendency to bounce around in the saddle with shorter cranks.

    Hope this helps.

  • 165's on the commuter, 170's on the beater. Don't really notice much difference.

  • It means you should ride your bike and not worry about it.

    *I *Don't, someone we both know does, though ;)

  • Basically... everyone here has an opinion, but know one really knows.

    Myself included.

    [165 & 170ish both fixed]

  • I know. I choose to remain silent on the matter.

  • sssshhh.

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

165 Cranks...who runs them?

Posted by Avatar for Jung @Jung

Actions