Vrijman's report cleared Armstrong because of improper handling and testing.[39][40]The report said tests on urine samples were conducted improperly andfell so short of scientific standards that it was "completelyirresponsible" to suggest they "constitute evidence of anything."[41]
The same Vrijman report which was criticised by WADA for "so lacking in professionalism and objectivity that it borders on farcical"?
Vrijman was personally appointed by Hein Verbruggen, the then chairman of the UCI and a long standing personal friend. To say it stinks of a cover up would be generous.
The same Vrijman report which was criticised by WADA for "so lacking in professionalism and objectivity that it borders on farcical"?
http://www.wada-ama.org/en/newsarticle.ch2?articleId=3115287
Vrijman was personally appointed by Hein Verbruggen, the then chairman of the UCI and a long standing personal friend. To say it stinks of a cover up would be generous.