That is fucking wrong. Things are headed a bad way it seems. Id rather it was finable not to wear a helmet than it to have implications on liability in collisions/incidents.
What if you simply cannot afford a helmet? I know I cant find a helmet that fits me that I can afford, and it says everywhere that a poorly fitting helmet is useless.
It also makes no sense and is a completely inbalanced judgement. Should we be found liable for broken ribs because we never wore chest armour which is readily available on the market?
That is fucking wrong. Things are headed a bad way it seems. Id rather it was finable not to wear a helmet than it to have implications on liability in collisions/incidents.
What if you simply cannot afford a helmet? I know I cant find a helmet that fits me that I can afford, and it says everywhere that a poorly fitting helmet is useless.
It also makes no sense and is a completely inbalanced judgement. Should we be found liable for broken ribs because we never wore chest armour which is readily available on the market?