they are proably just doing it cos they have to pay out so much when their drivers take out cyclists. they are probably trying to say in court, to try and cut the payout, that our research shows that
" joe bloggs who got hit by a car is an idiot, who was on his phone whilst drunk, and high on crack, cycling up a one way street the wrong way without a helmet on, and that it's not the car drivers fualt, even if he wasn't paying attention and was slightly drunk"
they are proably just doing it cos they have to pay out so much when their drivers take out cyclists. they are probably trying to say in court, to try and cut the payout, that our research shows that
" joe bloggs who got hit by a car is an idiot, who was on his phone whilst drunk, and high on crack, cycling up a one way street the wrong way without a helmet on, and that it's not the car drivers fualt, even if he wasn't paying attention and was slightly drunk"