Listen to what this prick head of Christian Voice says:
"It is given as a statement of fact and that means it must be capable of substantiation if it is not to break the rules,"
"There is plenty of evidence for God, from people's personal experience, to the complexity, interdependence, beauty and design of the natural world."
It's the ignorance that upsets me. And the blatant changing of the goal posts to suit their needs. One day you'll get into an argument with a Christian and they'll say "Oh, of course you can't prove he exists, it's a matter of faith, you just have to believe." Then, when they're trying to shit on something they don't like using the ASA, it's all "Oh, there's plenty of evidence." So - what is is to be, God-botherer?
Listen to what this prick head of Christian Voice says:
"It is given as a statement of fact and that means it must be capable of substantiation if it is not to break the rules,"
"There is plenty of evidence for God, from people's personal experience, to the complexity, interdependence, beauty and design of the natural world."
It's the ignorance that upsets me. And the blatant changing of the goal posts to suit their needs. One day you'll get into an argument with a Christian and they'll say "Oh, of course you can't prove he exists, it's a matter of faith, you just have to believe." Then, when they're trying to shit on something they don't like using the ASA, it's all "Oh, there's plenty of evidence." So - what is is to be, God-botherer?