Another stupid story (this time about Capo)

i'm not comparing steam roller to the capo. the steam roller is known for its long reach. i'm comparing the capo to the 54 sworks langster, the 54 oneway and the 56 converted colnago that my co worrker rides. the ride, in comparison to the langster i took out alot during season and right before i rode the capo, the capo had a very awkward reach. whatever. you want to keep bitching baout good for you. you won. you are smarter than a kid that works at a shop. is that what you want to hear? that just because you don't work at a shop you want to prove you still know more? thast fine. good for you man.

fuck. let it go. the bike has a shity geometry is all i'm saying.

As I said, I couldn't care either way, and not trying to prove anything and not saying I know more.
What I am saying is that the geometry of the bike is very much standard being pretty much 54cm square. I was just questioning why you were being so dramatic about the awful geometry and super long top tube when in fact it has very standard geometry. Just doesn't give what you are saying any credibility, that is all.

I'd see someone about your self esteem issue too :-)