i think that it is better to discuss less specific points as when you argue on minor streetscape points the arguments are far more compelling but also mean that the lines are drawn between cars/peds/cyclists. it is better to discuss what we really want the city to be - quiet, plesant, fun....etc or dull like canberra and Brasilia.
what about marginal users?
http://www.guidedogs.org.uk/index.php?id=6550
i think that it is better to discuss less specific points as when you argue on minor streetscape points the arguments are far more compelling but also mean that the lines are drawn between cars/peds/cyclists. it is better to discuss what we really want the city to be - quiet, plesant, fun....etc or dull like canberra and Brasilia.