-
• #202
48:19 might move up to 48:18
-
• #203
42:15 at present
Moving to 48:17 not alot different
Manageable enough for an old man on the South Downs in Hampshire
-
• #204
52:18 ss.
I think its ok for me, haven't had a chance to really try it out yet. -
• #205
i ride 48tx18t. It's pretty good, but sometimes a little stiff for pulling away/ hills when I'm tired, or hungover (so most of the time). I'm well boney, without much leg muscle and was wondering which way I should go with the back to make it a touch easier?
-
• #206
try a 47t on the front, makes it that little bit easier without going to far into 48:19 territory, which is too spinny for me.
-
• #207
49 x 19 quite nice really.
-
• #208
try a 47t on the front, makes it that little bit easier without going to far into 48:19 territory, which is too spinny for me.
cheers man, but I'm a tool. I meant 46t x 18t. Guess that means it should be piss easy already, huh?
I gotta start working out. And learn to count.
-
• #209
I just moved up to 48:19 (68ish) from 39:16(65ish) more comfatable on the flat and down hills still ok going up hill. Just made in up swains lane ok. Lots of skid patches. Good acceleration.
-
• #210
47T X 18T
find it damn slow . . .
and dont know how that thing works out with the 60-70 -
• #211
Hmmm. little worried.
I used to ride 42/15 fixed which i found ok with my heavy lump of a Kalkhoff
Now i'm riding a 49 16T freewheel (while I waited for delivery of dura ace)
Now i'm ready to stick the fixed on which will have me at 49/15 fixed.
From the previous discussion this puts me pretty high (mid eighties) and i'm in hilly Nottingham. I find the hills gut busting but my normal commute is on the flat. I found I was spinning pretty quick keeping up with traffic at 49/16... is my technieque off?
Got a nasty pain in my lower back but not sure if it's bike related, mmmm might consider getting a 17 or something for the flipside and riding that for the winter. Plan?
-
• #212
42:18 at the moment.
its that or 52:18 until i have pennies for a crankset, and the hills round here would have me walking too often(takes mtfu pill)
-
• #213
48 x18 good compromise
-
• #214
48x18 i find it very good to go around London
-
• #215
47x16
-
• #216
65x13.. anything else is for your Nan or your newborn.
-
• #217
48x18
Am I Hippy's Nan? I do hope not.
-
• #218
It'd be hard to post if you were..
-
• #219
Phew!
-
• #220
46 x 16 Fixed
53 x 16 SS -
• #221
This isn't very interesting.
-
• #222
48 x 18. Sucks cycling up Fitzjohns Rd every night.
-
• #223
This isn't very interesting.
Correct. But it IS a(nother) thread on gear ratios.
-
• #224
Threads about ratios are fine by me. WTF!? If you're bored by this subject (clue is in the thread title) don't fucking click on it.
I ride: 48x18 27" (soon to change this to 20t); 44/16 700 28c; 47x19 700 23c. The last one is easily the best fun, super spinny.
To the thread-dredger: Cheltenham aint exactly Bath, hills wise, so you could go up a bit, but don't be tempted to get a super hard gear, you may damage your knees. Also, spinny gears are much easier to skid/hop (if your'e using a fixed wheel).
As people always say on here, spin to win. With a 42 chainring I would get thee a 15t probably - much cheaper to switch rear cog than chainring. Don't be tempted to jump a huge difference, is my advice.
-
• #225
44/16 ss, just tested it out over crystal palace last night, works just fine.
Going too go 44/17 fixed on Murtle's advice
well, not if you use 23 x 700c wheels :
http://software.bareknucklebrigade.com/rabbit.applet.html