There goes civilisation...

It seems cg5154's ethical code works something like this:

If something is legal, it is legitimate, moral, and ethically acceptable.
If you can afford something, it is legitimate, moral, and ethically acceptable.
If you cannot afford something, you have no right to it - but that doesn't change its moral qualification for those who can.

You could probably take it a step further and say:

If it is illegal, it is likely to be because the state is trying to nanny us (i.e. an inefficient unfree market system).

they all deserve to lose everything.

saying that it's all right to buy anything given you have enough money is fucking ridiculous, so it was all right for Gary Glitter to buy a child in Cambodia, because he had the cash in his wallet? Or for that matter, buying stuff at primark or anywhere else like it because it's cheap, that's just ignorant consumption. I could write for hours about this, but it will all go over your head cg5154, cos you're morally void.