-
• #177
hippy So, if you are slow, stick with your 60rpm.
I think you might have willfully missed the point. ;P lol !
-
• #178
Moi.. willfully ignore a point.. well I never! Hmmpfh! Filthy swine! I challenge you to a du-el!
-
• #179
hippy If you had a triple, what would your cadence be up hills I wonder?
I used to have a triple - my cadence sitting down on hills was still about 60-70rpm. I just went a fuck of a lot slower ;(
-
• #180
I don't believe you! "slower" and "hills" in the same sentence! Liar. ;)
-
• #181
I used to quit on hills. Not even very steep or long ones. If anyone wants to take solace in that fact, be my guest.
-
• #182
No. I will ignore your previous comments. You are clearly distressed or intoxicated.
-
• #183
Reserrecting this thread for some aid: first few rides on a fixed and thinking I need a bigger gear. I'm on a 42:16 which is about 70" but feeling I can't put the hammer down as much as I like and it feels a bit spinney. Don't think I need to increase massively, but a bit bigger I think is needed (particularly for the downhills: I live in Cheltenham). Do I need to change both cogs? Or maybe just the front one to 44/46?
-
• #184
domt know if this has already been posted coz i cant b arsed to read the whole thread - might b useful for working out gear-ratios/skidpatches.
http://njsframes.blogspot.com/2007/07/kashima-5gold-njs-keirin-saddle.html(go to the bottom of the page).
-
• #185
Or try this;
http://software.bareknucklebrigade.com/ -
• #186
48 x 18
-
• #187
52x18 which is turning out to be a bit shit might get a 49 tooth
-
• #188
42 x 17 on 700c x 23, SS not fixed.
Suits an old boy like me !! -
• #189
44 x 17/16 on 175mm cranks, pretty good for C. London
17t puts me just under 70 gi
16t puts me just over 70 gi -
• #190
gonna try 44:16 then, gives me a mid-70s and I'll see how I roll
-
• #191
48 x 17 fixed
52 x 18 ss -
• #192
very useful
-
• #193
48 x 18
But i'm thinking that 47 x 17 is probably round about right - puts you at 72 gear inches. i find that i cant get as much speed on flats as id like, and i could handle a bit more on tough hills............ -
• #194
48t x 18t.
170
72.0
oh yeah! -
• #195
I find 48 x 16 too spinny :( anything below 48 x 14 on 700c (90") seems spinny.
My acceleration off the line (lights and so on) is not the fastest (but not bad) and I need to be steaming along to get up steep hills :( but boy can you get up some dreadful speed on 48 x 14 and a decent pair of legs on London's flat streets ! :)
All this talk of what is and is not right for various terrain doesn't really take all the factors in, like leg length, strength, short twitch to long twitch muscle ratio (we all differ by a fair amount - certainly more than a cog or two) even crank length (leverage). Building and riding a very light machine will also impact on acceleration, stopping and so on.
Just have a fixed filp hub. Big gear to make you feel like a man and a smaller one to be human!!
-
• #196
i ride 52-17 SS. its fast as hell and ive learned to ride it well after years of SS on various bikes in hilly cornwall.
-
• #197
47x17 would put you closer to 75 GI. it's what i run, currently.
48 x 18
But i'm thinking that 47 x 17 is probably round about right - puts you at 72 gear inches. i find that i cant get as much speed on flats as id like, and i could handle a bit more on tough hills............ -
• #198
i run 52 -15
-
• #199
@ repeat
when you get out to england, want to meet up, i will need to be around some one who talks american and spells mom and color right.
and everything else wrong..
-
• #200
ha
If you had a triple, what would your cadence be up hills I wonder?