Art is defined as having no use other than no exist as itself.
I didn't do an art course, but surely every kind of artwork can be seen as having a use other than existing, even if it's just making the big wall of an investment banker's penthouse flat look nice. So defining art as something with no use other than existing seems to drastically limit what you can define as art and would mean that most art galleries should empty since you have to get rid of every portrait, religious art, photograph, etc.
BTW, I think Dondi's Adidas three stripe trousers with Cinelli, Look, etc patches are cool as fuck
I didn't do an art course, but surely every kind of artwork can be seen as having a use other than existing, even if it's just making the big wall of an investment banker's penthouse flat look nice. So defining art as something with no use other than existing seems to drastically limit what you can define as art and would mean that most art galleries should empty since you have to get rid of every portrait, religious art, photograph, etc.
BTW, I think Dondi's Adidas three stripe trousers with Cinelli, Look, etc patches are cool as fuck