but not specifically saying gays prompted floods - the article infers that he said that through connecting some other things but by the quotes present he didn't. He goes on about god's judgement metered out in weather; he goes on about society's permissiveness; he talks about the new sexual whatever laws..but not gays causing floods. At the same time yeah, he seems to directly say some stuff that is fairly dumb to your average thinking person.
okay, I'm going out..
"The sexual orientation regulations [which give greater rights to gays] are part of a general scene of permissiveness. We are in a situation where we are liable for God's judgment, which is intended to call us to repentance."
Take what he says however you wish, the point is not particularly about what this man is saying it is about the general sense deference we so easily give to whatever these men say.
"The sexual orientation regulations [which give greater rights to gays] are part of a general scene of permissiveness. We are in a situation where we are liable for God's judgment, which is intended to call us to repentance."
Take what he says however you wish, the point is not particularly about what this man is saying it is about the general sense deference we so easily give to whatever these men say.